So many of these blogs are done with the express intent of peeving
people off or making people go WTF is this man going on and on about.
I tend to try to look at things that I think are silly, crazy or
downright stupid and try to make people understand exactly how messed
up things can be. I am rarely kind or gentle in my words so people
tend to get annoyed if not downright angry with me. I make no
apologies for this and will continue to do so in the future as I see
fit. You don't name a blog, Sometimes Its Okay To Be An Ass with the
goal of making sunshine and daisies.
Now having said that, what I am about to put in front of you all is
not really intended to make you angry or mock other people. In no
way am I expressing disdain for the Unemployed or those who have the
misfortune to be on any sort of public assistance. This is just a
blog to cover one of the many odd thoughts that often occur to me.
Please do not take insult because, in the case anyway, no insult was
meant.
Usually I preface these rants with “Well I just read an article
about...” after which I go on (And on and on and on...) about how
stupid the article was or about the sheer idiocy shown in the
comments section. Gods I could do entire books on the ignorant
comments shown after so many articles, but that is another story.
This time, I was innocently fixing dinner for my wife and I (Pancake
battered chicken, mixed veggies and corn bread for the foodies out
there.) when a thought struck me. I struck it back and a lively
fight ensued. Once we had exhausted each other, I decided to put the
thoughts down for your perusal.
You hear a lot these days about Welfare and the So-Called Nanny State
wherein loads and loads of people are receiving some form of
assistance from the US Government (SNAP, WIC etc). The talks range
from “Leeches sucking off the Government Teat” to “People who
are down on their luck who just need a hand.” Please feel free to
pick the one that best suits your temperament and continue the blog.
Ready? Okay, on we go!
So my mind quickly snagged on this string of thought and ran with it
like a kitten on steroids. (Wow now there is a disturbing image.)
It asked in all innocence, “Well, what about extended unemployment
benefits?” To which I answered “What the what?” However,
after some long minutes of standing in the kitchen with drool hanging
from my mouth, I actually stopped and pondered what the idea might
actually mean.
During the Great Recession, millions upon millions of people lost
their jobs due the massive economic downturn. During this period,
these millions applied for Unemployment benefits as was their due.
As time passed some were lucky enough to find new jobs and get off
the Unemployment line and back to work. Many more remain to this day
unable to find gainful unemployment. According to some figures,
hundreds of thousands if not millions of people have simply given up
looking for jobs that simply aren't there.
Since the very beginning, long after Standard Unemployment Benefits
would have been exhausted, the Government has voted time and again to
keep extending the benefits to the unemployed so that they can keep
paying their bills and feeding their families. This is all well and
good and I fully support it, but the question has to be asked, “How
long do we keep doing it?”
One of the main, if somewhat inaccurate, arguments people make
against Welfare is that it encourages people who are on it to simply
allow the Government to take care of them. After all, if there is no
real incentive to find work and earn your own money, then why do it.
Why not keep sucking on that teat for all time? I mean hey when you
are living high on the hog on SNAP and WIC (Insert sarcasm font
here.) why actually work for a living? Old Uncle Sam will take care
of you, right?
Well, if you can think that about Welfare, then how far do we go for
the Unemployed? I mean, how long do we as a people and a Government
keep handing out money to people just to keep them going? Especially
given the huge number of people who have stopped looking for work at
all, aren't we in danger of becoming a Nanny State for them too?
Anti-Welfare Advocates argue that “Hey yeah it sucks that a family
of four can't afford to feed themselves, but why should the
government have to do it? Let the local charities take care of
them!” (As a side note here, it should be noted that, despite what
a lot of people believe, not every every Welfare recipient is a Crack
Head with 14 children. A depressingly large number of Government
Assistance recipients are actively serving in our Nation's Armed
Forces.)
Unemployment benefits for those who lost their jobs during the GR
have long since been exhausted. The US Government has kept funding
flowing to the jobless from other sources for years. So how long do
we keep giving them money? How long before the “Nanny State”
grows and becomes permanent for those who cannot find work? As
usual, I have no real answers and only have questions which have no
real answers.
End of Rant
No comments:
Post a Comment